Yihao Wu1,2, Zhicai Luo3, Bo Zhong4, and Chuang Xu2,5

1School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China
2State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, China
3MOE Key Laboratory of Fundamental Physical Quantities Measurement, School of Physics,
Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
4School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
5School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangdong, China

Abstract: A multilayer approach is set up for local gravity field recovery within the framework of multi-resolution representation, where the gravity field is parameterized as the superposition of multiple layers of Poisson wavelets located at different depths beneath the Earth’s surface. The layers are designed to recover gravity signals at different scales, where the shallow and deep layers mainly capture the short- and long-wavelength signals, respectively. The depths of these layers are linked to the locations of different anomaly sources beneath the Earth’s surface, which are estimated by wavelet decomposition and power spectrum analysis. For testing the performance of this approach, a gravimetric quasi-geoid model over the North Sea, QGNSea V1.0, is modeled and validated against independent control data. The results show that the multilayer approach fits the gravity data better than the traditional single-layer approach, particularly in regions with topographical variation. An Akaike information criterion (AIC) test shows that the multilayer model obtains a smaller AIC value and achieves a better balance between the goodness of fit of data and the simplicity of the model. Further, an evaluation using independent GPS/leveling data tests the ability of regional models computed from different approaches towards realistic extrapolation, which shows that the accuracies of the QGNSea V1.0 derived from the multilayer approach are better by 0.4, 0.9, and 1.1 cm in the Netherlands, Belgium, and parts of Germany, respectively, than that using the single-layer approach. Further validation with existing models shows that QGNSea V1.0 is superior with respect to performance and may be ben- eficial for studying ocean circulation between the North Sea and its neighboring waters.

https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4797-2018